Pedo Chat #1

'EXPLAIN WHY'

The first in a series of conversations between pedos, debating one issue or another. The conversations range from 1,000 to 3,000 words, taking 10-20 mins to read. This one is 3,000. The author does not condone any actions described herein, and the reader is expected to separate reality from harmless (but arousing) fantasy.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *



TONY: Explain why.



PHIL: Well, they're kind of at the peak of childhood at that age.



TONY: `Peak'? What the hell is that supposed to mean? [They chuckle].



PHIL: It means... [thoughtful]... they're still children, hundred percent, but haven't started puberty yet. However, they've reached kind of maximum development for children.



TONY: Which means?



PHIL: It means they're about as high as a child can get - `tall' I mean - and other attributes are maximized too.



TONY: Yeah, well, I did assume you didn't mean `as in drugs' [They laugh]. Anyway, `other attributes'? Explain.



PHIL: Legs and butt are maximized.



TONY: `Maximized' [He Laughs].



PHIL: I mean, they have the female `qualities' to the full - like a tiny bit of hip curve and butt perkiness, and their legs have grown quite long. Still skinny, though, like children.



TONY: Bloody hell. The butts, yeah, I know what you mean. Like little bubbles.



PHIL: Yes.



TONY: They're just begging to be fucked.



PHIL: Well, yeah. That and grabbed, licked, fingered - whatever.



TONY: What would be your first choice?



PHIL: [Thinks]. Gotto be fuck, I suppose. Putting penis up a little girl's butt has to be the ultimate - probably after licking it first, mind! [They chuckle]. 



TONY: You can do that with a 5-year-old, though. Any age, in fact.



PHIL: Of course, yeah, in theory. Don't you think it'd be easier with a 9 or 10, though?



TONY: Not a lot, if at all.



PHIL: The penetration, I mean, mainly. A 9-year old girl's asshole and rectum MUST be a bit more fully grown and able to take a man's penis?



TONY: Okay, I'll concede that, a bit. You'd be surprised, though. Not a great deal of difference, I reckon. I've heard some guys who have been there - they say their assholes will stretch much more than their vaginas, whatever age.



PHIL: True, true. Anyway, we digress...



TONY: Yes, we do. Well, you still haven't convinced me why these things would be more fun on a 9/10 year-old. Just because one aspect of it might be `easier', isn't the same as saying it's more `fun'.



PHIL: Well, no, I guess not. It's not so much the `easiness' I am thinking of. It's just the sexiness of her slightly more grown-up body, and the more girlie shape of her butt. It's aethetics on the eyes, I suppose, as much as pure sensation.



TONY: `Aesthetics' [He chuckles]. That's a good euphemism for `pedo perversion'!



PHIL: Well... no. Hey, there is the `aesthetic' element to it, you know. Personally, I love the the mere sight of the 9/10-year-old girl form, and I admire it like an artform. 



TONY: Yes, especially if naked.



PHIL: Ha, well, yes. Of course.



TONY: So, you're saying it's more fun to have sex with a 9-year-old than a 5-year-old because her body is more grown? In a nutshell, that's it, right?



PHIL: I guess that summarizes it, yes. But...



TONY: But what if *I* prefer her to be `less grown'? I mean, personally I want a 5-year-old precisely BECAUSE she is smaller and the `taboo factor' is greater.



PHIL: Hey, plenty of `taboo factor' with a 10-year-old, you know!



TONY: In many people's eyes, no doubt [He shrugs].



PHIL: But not in yours?



TONY: Well, yes, but not as much as a 5-year-old, obviously.



PHIL: So, the `shock' value turns you on? The kind of sick element of it?



TONY: `Sick' is a matter of opinion, but yeah you have a point.



PHIL: I find plenty of that emotion in taking a 10-year-old, but the added thrill is that her body is frankly more interesting.



TONY: Ha! [He points at him]. That's precisely it: interesting `to you', because she's more grown, but the 5-year-old is more interesting to me precisely because she's not.



PHIL: Don't you feel there is a lack of `girlie' sexiness to them when so young, though? I mean, they are kind of toddlers, and haven't got their proper female looks yet in face or in body. 



TONY: Bodies, okay, I can concede a little bit. Obviously they haven't got that slender elegance that is taking shape in a 9 or 10...



PHIL: Precisely. Slender elegance. A 9-year-old is like a woman in miniature - without the tits, of course.



TONY: Haha, yeah. A 5-year-old, in `face', though - hell, man, haven't you seen 5-year-olds with cute faces? Heartbreaking, some of them!



PHIL: Yes, yes, of course.  `Cute' is the word, though. `Pretty', definitely, but not `sexy'. A pretty 9-year-old is ALWAYS `sexy', whereas a pretty 5-year-old can sometimes look a bit ridiculous, like a doll.



TONY: Hell, no, fundamentally disagree with that. If a girl - meaning a `child' - is pretty, then she's sexy too, whatever the age, to guys like us, at least.



PHIL: The face of a good-looking 9-year-old has to be sexier than a good-looking 5-year-old.



TONY: No: `opinion'. It's a matter of opinion.



PHIL: Well, how would you feel about kissing - I mean as in French-kissing - a 9-year-old compared with a 5-year-old? Surely the 9's mouth would be better: it's a bit bigger, you can get tongue in more, hell - there's just more `sensation'.



TONY: Possibly, possibly. Now, that has almost got me converted [They chuckle]. `Almost'. But think about it: part of the fun is in trying to get your mouth round the extremely small shape of HER mouth - and with a 5-year-old that aspect of it is exacerbated.



PHIL: `Exacerbated' - you're sounding like a doctor now. Seriously, though, I can see some appeal in that. A lot actually: hell, trying to kiss a 5-year-old's mouth, yes. The size isn't the only aspect, though.



TONY: What else?



PHIL: It's behavior. For me, part of the whole package of a 9 or 10 is that she has that bit of blossoming awareness of what sex is all about.



TONY: Hardly `blossoming'.



PHIL: Okay, I grant you, that's more the word for a 13 to 15-year-old. Let's say... a 9 does have a bit more responsiveness and knowledge of what is happening than a 5 does.



TONY: In what way, `responsive'?



PHIL: Well, she'll realise it is a `sexual' thing, although she probably only has a dull concept of what `sex' is. The reaction in her eyes will be a lot different than to a 5-year-old when your mouth closes on hers. Just think it.



TONY: Yes, it will be, a bit.



PHIL: A lot. A 9-year-old will be very embarrassed. Your average 10, even more so - things change in their minds quite quick around 10 -which is part of the appeal, to catch them at the `peak'.



TONY: A 5 would be embarrassed too, but kind of giggly I reckon, and puzzled. She'd ask "why did you do that?"



PHIL: Yes. Total innocence. Whereas a 9/10 will know it's a love-gesture. And her reaction more intense because of it.



TONY: Maybe I don't want that intensity, though? I just want the complete simplistic innocence.



PHIL: For me, a spark would be missing. It would be fun, yeah, but a bit like kissing a pretty little doll rather than a real girl.



TONY: A 5-year-old is a `real' girl, believe me! It's just that she's a real 5-year-old girl and not a real 9-year-old girl.



PHIL: Hehe, okay, okay. Well, other things we haven't touched on...



TONY: Go on.



PHIL: Groping of her body: for me, that would be more fun with a 9/10, simply because there is `more' there of interest, as we've discussed. The flat chest - all the more erotic because she is almost - I say `almost' - big and old enough to have tits, so the `lack' of them is emphasised. In many cases, she might actually HAVE very small tits already, all the better. 



TONY: Hey, you've got to allow for some guys who just don't want any sign of tit whatsoever.



PHIL: True. Well, in that case a big proportion of 9s or 10s would still fit that bill.



TONY: Granted.



PHIL: Hell, even some 14-year-olds.



TONY: Hell, even the odd 18-year-old.



PHIL: Or `woman'.



TONY: Yes, let's not get into grannies, though. The motion of this debate is `a 9/10 year-old is more pedo fun than a 5/6 year-old'.



PHIL: Okay, just to emphasise the point about their chests...



TONY: Yeah?



PHIL: You know how they look at the beach or in the swimming pool with those skimpy bikini tops or bathing costumes tight-fitting?



TONY: I can see it now.



PHIL: Well, with a 9-10 does it not just exaggerate how they do not in fact need anything there. They don't need a freaking bra/bikini, and yet they wear one for decency's sake!



TONY: Yes, so?



PHIL: So, I find that hot. All their modesty does is point up the fact they have no tits to speak of, and the more I think about their lack of tits the more I want to have sex with them!



TONY: Well, that's because you're a pedo, and because you love children.



PHIL: Well, yeah, obviously.



TONY: It doesn't explain why you would find her hotter than a 5-year-old in the same get-up.



PHIL: Well it does. With a 5-year-old, it goes without saying there are no tits. So, when you see a 10-year-old with no tits, the thrill is heightened because you know she `might' have had them, and she'll be getting them in a year or two. But for now, she is still just `all child'.



TONY: Well, a 5-year-old is even more `all child'.



PHIL: All child but lacking femininity.



TONY: [He sighs]. No, not at all. You need to look at some 5-year-old butts, my friend. I mean a close look. There is often an incredible, awesomely sexy shape to them. If you wanna talk about `womanlyness', hell - a 5-year-old often has a puffy, squidgy butt that is even MORE like a woman in miniature than a 9-year-old! It's kind of `too big for her body'.



PHIL: I think that depends on the 5-year-old. Anyway, I refute that: they do not have the height and the slenderness to give them that female sex-factor. You need a bit of height to bring out the perkiness of the buttocks. You just take a look at the way a 9-year-old stands or runs - the way her little arse pops out backward. Just awesome!



TONY: I know the view, yeah.



PHIL: So you concede: a 9-year-old generally has a sexier arse than a 5-year-old?



TONY: Possibly. Don't you think that can depend on the 9-year-old, too, though?



PHIL: To a lesser extent, yeah, but she'll more often have a sexier arse to look at - hence `to do things to' - than a 5-year-old.



TONY: I might concede you that, but it does still depend on what you define as `sexy'. Anyway, moving on... next point?



PHIL: `Positions'.



TONY: What about them? And what positions?



PHIL: The opportunities for eroticism in sexual positions are much greater with a 9/10-year-old, due to her body-size.



TONY: That's a bold freaking statement. How so?



PHIL: Okay. One: imagine her in doggy - that slender smooth, titless frame on all-fours. Getting in behind her, groping her all over, handling her as you take her in the cunt or the arse.



TONY: Imagined.



PHIL: Two: imagine her in all the varieties of missionary, or any leg-spreading position for that matter, such as doing it on a chair. It's going to be much more erotic - and more `feasible' - simply because she has longer legs and a longer body. Basically, you can fuck her in much the same way as you would a woman, but you still have the added thrill that it's a child and her body is much smaller than yours.



TONY: Yes, okay, I'll concede that point. But... but... [He raises hs eyebrows and smirks].



PHIL: What?



TONY: Likewise, a 5-year-old has erotic advantages of position.



PHIL: That's a bold freaking statement if ever I heard one.



TONY: And true. For one thing - `lap play'. You can sit her on your lap, and she's that much more cute and manouvreable as a plaything. Hell, the fact you could just bloody lift her around much easier is appealing to me.



PHIL: I can see how it might be.



TONY: A particular favourite of mine: fucking her between the thighs, with her sitting with her back to you on your lap. This would be an advantage with a 5-year-old because, one - your erection is gonna poke right out between her thighs, highlighting the size, and two - because she's lighter and smaller you can have one hell of an energetic bouncing fuck with her.



PHIL: Nice, yes, That is appealing. You mean non-penetrative fuck, though.



TONY: In this case, yes. But you could have one hell of an orgasm, and your cum is gonna splatter all over her belly and her thighs. Make her handle it, too.



PHIL: Damn, yes. Still can't beat an arse-grind of a 9/10-year-old in doggy, though, or the potential for 69ing with her because her body is long enough.



TONY: Granted, a 69 would be difficult to accomplish with a 5, but you can sure as hell lick out a 5-year-old, or have her suck you off.



PHIL: Yes, but nicer with the bigger mouth of a 9-year-old. She'll probably do it better, and you can get more in - same as her cunt, really.



TONY: You know what. I will concede one point on this...



PHIL: What's that?



TONY: The one thing I do see as drawback of sex with a 5-year-old is penetration - vaginal, I'm talking about - is very limited. Unless you want to kill the poor little thing, that is.



PHIL: Yeah, or injure her for life.



TONY: 9 or 10 has its limitations too, of course.



PHIL: Yes, it does. And that's my point. A 10-year-old girl is a very small, waif-like human being, you know. No need to go younger for the thrill of small size!



TONY: Okay, okay {Laughs]. So, what penetration do you think is possible with a 10?



PHIL: I reckon 3 to 4 inches are feasible, with no ill-effects.



TONY: Maybe even more.



PHIL: Maybe. Especially if it's her arse.



TONY: Yes.



PHIL: Okay, same question for a 5-year-old.



TONY: Okay, well I think very limited pokes at her cunt only, I'm afraid.



PHIL: The head?



TONY: Yes, top inch or two at the most. Just enough to nestle in between her labia and get semen into her.



PHIL: Jeez, imagine the fucking mess.



TONY: Precisely. Some will go in, most will just flood around her little vulva.



PHIL: Tell you what - I'm almost converted. `Almost' [They chuckle].



TONY: We'll agree to differ then. Let's say `a 5-year-old and a 9-year-old both have unique appealing qualities for sex, but ultimately it is a matter of opinion which has the 'most'.



PHIL: Well put. So, let's bring this discussion to a close, eh?



TONY: Yep, until the next one.



PHIL: Hehe, yeah. Well, I propose...



TONY: [waiting with interest].



PHIL: I propose we each say `one thing' that we would do with our chosen age. The top thing on our list.



TONY: Okay. Hell, that's quite tough...



PHIL: I'll go first then.



TONY: Right.



PHIL: You've probably guessed it. It would have to be `take her up the arse in doggy position'. A nice, slim, pretty 9-year-old. Careful sodomy of her, with lube, as much as 3 inches in maybe, blowing my load in her bowels.



TONY: Damn, yes. Anyway, mine is... [thinks]... a straight-forward blow job. Cumming in her mouth. Failing that, if she's so freaked out, just a two-handed hand-job.



PHIL: Hey, that's two things! But anyway, go on, elaborate...



TONY: Well, it's her two little hands around my cock, working it - oh my God, how big it would look in her 5-year-old hands, so soft too. Her hands, that is. Her face too, her intent little expression as she sees my cum spewing out everywhere.



PHIL: On her little hands, yeah, nice. She'll notice the smell too.



TONY: Hell, yeah. Now, don't you think her total innocence and curiosity about that would be one hell of a turn-on?



PHIL: For sure, she might be repulsed too, though. Not sure actually, about the balance of a 5-year-old's curiosity against `fear factor' at our cum the first time.



TONY: I think she'd giggle to be honest. Then she'd go "ughh" and pull a face - no different to getting a wad of glue on her hands at school.



PHIL: I agree. Well, anyway, can I name a second thing now?



TONY: Go ahead.



PHIL: On an armchair, with her kneeling around my waist and facing me. We're both naked of course.



TONY: Of course. Damn, that's hot.



PHIL: In this position her face is almost level with mine. We can kiss. I can grope her beautiful little 9-year-old bum, and penetration of her vagina can be attempted.



TONY: It would `have' to be attempted. You'd have a hard-on to end all hard-ons in that position.



PHIL; Yep, and the advantage is she can be kind of be in control, taking the cock into herself. If she is reluctant, though, I can easily get a good hold of her to coerce her onto it.



TONY: This is if you haven't exploded already by now.



PHIL: Bloody hell, yes.



TONY: If truth be told, I think I'd explode pretty damn quick once a 5-year-old's hands got round my cock.



PHIL: Me too, depending on the 5-year-old. How she looks, and her skill-level.



TONY: Ya.



[A pause, and reflective ebb in the conversation].



PHIL: Seriously, mouth would be your first choice? Fucking a 5-year-old girl in her mouth? Think how extreme that is.



TONY: Yes, and that's why it's my first choice.



PHIL: Okay.



TONY: Pretty damn extreme to shove it up a 9-year-old's rectum too.



PHIL: Well, yes, I guess [He shrugs]. Some things have just got to be done, though, and a 9-year-old girl's arse is a thing of beauty.



TONY: Quite.



PHIL: Exquisite beauty.



TONY: Quite. Like a 5-year-old's face - if she's pretty.



PHIL: Yes.



TONY: God, man, I really want a child so much it hurts.



PHIL: Me too. How would you feel about her over there?



TONY: That 9/10 with the hairband? Shoulder-length brunette?



PHIL: Yeah, and the skinny pert arse.



TONY: In a heartbeat - in every way. If we couldn't get a 5, that is [They chuckle].



PHIL: Well, if we couldn't get a 9 I'd take that little one over there in a heartbeat [Nods to indicate a 4-6yo blonde prancing about].



TONY: Ohhhhh, fuck... yess!



* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

* * * * * * * * * * THE END * * * * * * * * * *

email the author at Mazeppa1968@hotmail.co.uk I'd love to hear
any feedback you have, whether or not you share the feelings of any of my
characters. Who 'won' this debate?! Is there anything you would add?

http://www.asstr.org/files/Authors/englishperv/ for all my stories

